Originally Posted by: Yoyo We are setting up a new site, and I am wondering the pros and cons of different folders for the images.
Putting everything in one folder or separate folders for each group of images.
Headers, Icons and product images.
Should product images be broken into smaller categories, such as based on product type or supplier.
You're bound to get a variety of opinions on this one. In my mind, the most important thing is to organize your images in a way that makes it easy for
you to manage. In most cases that means separate sub-folders under the images folder. Creating manufacturer sub-folders (e.g. /images/manufacturer-1/myimage.jpg) makes sense to me. If you have a lot of products that might not be granular enough so you might need to go one step further and organize by product type/category (e.g. /images/manufacturer-1/product-type/myimage.jpg).
One thing that we've found that makes it easier to manage images is to use the SKU as the filename. This is beneficial if you ever need to perform bulk changes to your catalog data because you can generate the filename by using the SKU. If you have multiple images per product you would want to name them in a standard way (e.g. myimage-1.jpg, myimage-2.jpg, etc).
One final consideration is SEO. The filename and path (folder structure) does have some effect on SEO, particularly for Google image search. This is where you will need to make a trade-off between manageability and optimal SEO.
Originally Posted by: Yoyo My plan was to load only one size of image, about 1000x1000 pixels, and let BV13 re-size them.
This size is great for the additional images, but you'll definitely want to reduce the size for the small and medium images (it sounds like this is what you're planning to do, but I just wanted to clarify).
Edited by user Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:59:29 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified