Do you think it'd be a hassle to beef up the search function a bit? There are only a finite number of terms that come to mind when building a product, perhaps 6 or 8.... I've found that we need to enter both the singular and plural versions of any searchable terms.


Shouldn't search assume that if you search for either: 'blouse' or 'blouses' or 'kettle' or 'kettles' it would be OK to return results for the other as well?



I know... foot/feet won't work, but it is 2007. Automatically adding and deleting an 's' gets us up to 1998 or so.



Joe, at Birdsafestore, searches for 'carrier' and carriers' gave wildly different results, as did 'vitamin' and 'vitamins'.